Showing posts with label organic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label organic. Show all posts

Monday, November 24, 2008

Retail Memo: Customer-Owned Retail Food Cooperative Stores Gaining New Popularity in Reccessionary America

Seattle, Washington USA-based PCC Natural Markets operates 10 modern cooperative natural foods supermarkets in the Seattle Metropolitan region. The photo collage above shows the exterior and interior of one of those stores, [Photo credit: PCC Natural Markets.]

Food retailing and consumers in trying economic times

The retail food cooperative movement in the United States was brought across the Atlantic, like many other things, from Europe, where beginning after the second World War the cooperative, customer-owned food stores started to blossom in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and other parts of Europe.

In the U.S. retail food cooperative stores began to blossom in the 1960's and early 1970's as part of the counter-cultural movement, when mostly younger consumers began forming cooperatives as a means to both save money and have greater political control over their food purchases, as well as an attempt to create a greater sense of community for themselves

The retail cooperatives sprung up rapidly from California, the Pacific Northwest and Colorado in the west, to the Midwest and eastern USA.

There were some retail food coops prior to the 1960's in the U.S., but they were mostly informal operations.

The 1960's versions were in many ways the first U.S. natural foods markets, and unlike the American retail food cooperatives before them put an emphasis on healthy and natural food products, as well as collective customer-worker relationships. These coops thrived in the 1970's and into the early 1980's

Beginning in about the mid-1980's, retail food cooperatives began to lose business in the U.S. (along with closings like the once very popular multi-store Berkeley, California food coop), to a large degree because new, modern for-profit natural foods markets were springing up throughout the land. These stores included Whole Foods Market, Wild Oats, Alfalfa's and many modern, independent natural foods stores. Additionally, numerous independent grocery stores throughout the U.S. started selling a decent selection of natural, organic and healthy foods in the 1980's, which also led to the decline of the cooperatives.

Many retail coop stores continued to thrive in the 1980's and beyond though, including the popular Davis Food Co-Op in Davis, California near Sacramento and the Sacramento Natural Foods Co-Op in Sacramento, which is building a second store; the four-store Bloomingfoods market coop in Indiana; and the 10-store PCC Natural Markets coop chain in Washington state, for example, along with many others in the west, Midwest, south, Mid-Atlantic and eastern U.S. The movement was much smaller however -- and the retail cooperatives that tended to survive and thrive were those that adopted a more modern natural foods store retailing model, such as the Pacific Northwest's PCC and others like it.

If you set foot in many of these thriving retail food cooperative stores today, you would have no idea they aren't for-profit natural and organic food stores. The look is modern and even upscale in many cases. The departments are the same, and the brands no different than those found in Whole Foods Market stores. Of course, few are as upscale or elaborate as Whole Foods, which is a positive for the coops today.

The big difference is that the retail coops are owned by members who buy shares in the cooperative as well as work in the stores for no pay in return for being able to purchase food and groceries at a substantial discount, often at the wholesale cost or slightly above.

It is this model, savings and value, that retail cooperatives were created to serve primarily after all. Pay a small annual fee of say a couple hundred dollars and/or volunteer a few hours a week working in the store, and in return receive a substantial discount on all the food and groceries you buy at the store -- with all the profits going back into the operations. The coops also are run by the owner-employees-customers, and generally feature a board of directors that makes policy, with the "owners" voting on major initiatives and policy changes.

The retail cooperative model is ripe for bad economic times such as the U.S. and most of the world finds itself in. And it's no surprise that as a result the retail food coop movement is gaining fast in a new popularity. After all, for people aged 18 -to- 40 retail food cooperatives are really a completely new thing in many ways. They were either small children or not yet born in the 1960's and 1970's. And for those older than say 50 who remember retail cooperative stores, or belonged to one while attending college for example (college towns were popular coop towns), its can be for them a perfect money-saving solution to the current recession, as well as a way to increase their sense of community in these difficult times.

One of the regions in the U.S. where coops are gaining popularity and members, as well as expanding, is in New York.

A story in yesterday's New York Daily News, "Shoppers work for food as co-ops surge," describes the growing popularity of a number of retail food cooperative stores in the New York region.

"There's been a steady growth in co-ops, with a spurt in the past few years,"Barry Smith, manager of the Flatbush (New York City) Food Co-Op, which opened in 1976 and requires its members to invest $200 - no labor involved, says in the New York Daily News story. "We're definitely in an upswing," Smith says.

Like we said, retail food cooperatives have never went away -- but they are on an upswing throughout the U.S.

For example, the National Cooperative Grocers Association, which operates 109 co-ops in 32 states in the U.S., recently reported annual sales of more than $945 million. That would be strong annual sales for a for-profit natural foods store chain of 109 stores. Rather impressive. The association is setting a goal to achieve sales of $3 billion annually in its stores by 2020.

In New York City's South Bronx, five New Yorkers started the South Bronx Food Co-Op last year. Now there are 120 members and the store recently expanded its hours to five days a week from just one, according to the Daily News' story.

"I'm shocked to see how people have gotten into it,"says South Bronx Food Co-Op Director Zena Nelson. "People want to be part of something. And we're saving money."

That wanting to be a part of something is what we mean by the political and community-based motivation, along with the economic, that's always been a central part of the retail food coop movement in the U.S., as well as in Europe.

We believe in addition to the current recession, the surge in the food coop movement in the U.S. is tied to the recent activism evidenced in the Barack Obama Presidential campaign in which literally millions of Americans of all ages, and particularly young people, got out in their communities and organized in a grass roots way for President-elect Obama's victory. The Obama campaign and the retail food cooperative movement both have the grass roots or "bottom up" organizational concepts very much in common.

Participating in a retail food cooperative store, particularly if one volunteers as well as just pays a membership fee, is a form of community. And saving money is part of that benefit. In fact, sometimes bad economic conditions serve as a catalyst for such change. Motivated by saving money consumers try something new, in this case joining retail food cooperatives. Once a member, they find additional benefits such as a greater sense of community and greater involvement with the food they consume in the process.

For example, read what Jamie Principe, an architect for a Manhattan design firm says about her "second job" as a shift manager at the Park Slope retail food coop store in the city neighborhood of the same name as the store in the Daily News' story: "I think it's terrific,"says the 38-year-old mother of two, who says she saves her family about 30% on groceries. 'The co-op even provides child care while she works.'

One can tell in her quote that she loves the economic benefit (the savings of 30% on her groceries) of being involved with the Park Slope retail coop store. But you can also tell she loves the sense of community it brings her. Otherwise why would a hard working, well paid architect work a "second job" as a shift manager at the store?

Here's the second part of Jamie Principe's quote from the story: "It's being part of a community," she said. "It's kind of a back to basics."

Architect Principe isn't alone in her views: 'The Park Slope Food Co-Op, which opened in 1973, said its membership has grown to 14,7000 - including a 10% spike in the last year alone - from 5,700 in 2001, according to the story in the Daily News'. Most for-profit supermarkets and natural foods stores would be very pleased with a 10% spike in a one year period of time.

Read the full story, "Shoppers work for food as co-ops surge," by New York Daily News staff writer Stephanie Gaskell here.

The growing retail food cooperative movement is giving that sign, "Will Work For Food," a whole new meaning in these trying economic times in the U.S.

We believe the movement will continue to grow. Not just because of the savings on food and groceries it offers consumers but also because of the sense of community it brings, as described by Jamie Principe.

There are changes brewing in America around the sense of and definition of community. As we mentioned, bad economic times usually serve as a catalyst for change. These can be good or bad changes.

But often they are positive ones because generally the things that brought about the bad economic times were negative, such as greed and excess. A greater sense of community, along with the financial need to save money, often has been the response to periods of bad economic times in America. And often these behavioral changes last long after the bad economy goes away.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Retail Memo - Foodservice: First 100% Certified Organic Bar in the U.S. (Maybe the World) Opens Just in Time For The Holidays

Inside (above) New York City's GustOrganic 100% certified organic bar. [Photo credit: Keetsa.]

From the Natural~Specialty Foods Memo Editor's Desk: The first certified organic bar in the United States (and perhaps the world) has opened in New York City's Greenwich Village just in time for the rapidly approaching Christmas and New Years holidays.

The bar, GustOrganic, is located inside the popular New York City organic restaurant of the same name.

Now with both a certified organic restaurant and bar in the same building, dedicated organic food eaters and beverage drinkers won't have to step outside of their organic lifestyles at GustOrganic in order to have a before, during and after dinner cocktail with their 100% organic meals.

The 100% certified organic bar also will likely be the destination for pure organic lifestyle folks this New Year's Eve. Now they can get an all-organic New Years Eve buzz on without having to ingest pesticides and other chemicals used in the grains that makes the various spirits which are used to make their favorite holiday cocktails. We suspect there will be organic champagne available on New Years Eve to toast in 2009 as well.

Writer Brain Merchant attended the opening night of GustOrganic, which for sure is the first 100%certified organic bar in America and just might be the first of its kind in the world. He published a report on the organic bar recently in the online environmental publication Treehugger.com. We bring you his piece below:

World’s First 100 % USDA Certified Organic Bar Celebrates Opening Night
by Brian Merchant, Brooklyn, New York
Treehugger.com

GustOrganic, an all-organic restaurant in New York is now also home to the world’s first all-organic bar. Using entirely organic spirits—beers, cocktails, wine, and liquor, GustOrganic is the first bar to be certified organic by the USDA. I was on hand for the celebratory opening night to find out what 100 percent organic martinis, mojitos, and margaritas taste like—and eventually, to investigate the first 100 percent organic hangover.

Since GustOrganic is a restaurant by day, it was pretty impressive how suitable the atmosphere was for an eco-chic bar. Dim lighting, stark décor, and an expansive layout made the whole place seem more like a SoHo nightclub than a Greenwich Village organic restaurant. And it all helped bring the focus towards the newly christened, pleasantly crowded bar.

Introducing the All-Organic Bar

The bar is stocked with certified organic rum, vodka, whiskey, tequila, organic wine, Peak Organic beers, and plenty of fresh fruit for the creation of all-organic cocktails. This means, according to GustOrganic, “All the drinks are free of chemicals, artificial substances, hormones and pesticides.” In addition to the environmental benefits, this theoretically means headaches should be easier in the morning, too (more on that later).

I tried golden standards like the martini and the mojito, both of which more than passed muster—the mojito was perhaps the freshest I’ve ever had. But the real stars were the creative cocktails made with fresh fruit: the Fresquito, made with mangos, orange juice and vodka, and the strawberry filled Rojito were standouts. They all made for quite a (blurrily) memorable night. As for the morning—well, let’s just say ‘organic drinks’ does not equal ‘hangover-proof.’ But it certainly could mean fewer headaches for someone who isn’t bent on trying every drink on the menu. Perhaps a follow up is in order.

GustOrganic Lives Up to Its Name

As a restaurant, GustOrganic already boasts a strong dedication to organics and sustainability. Owner Alberto Gonzalez has covered as many eco-friendly bases as he can, with gusto: there’s a wind turbine on the roof, the menus are made from 100 percent recycled paper and printed with soy ink, and every single ingredient he uses is certified organic. Just to name a few.

Gonzalez plans on keeping the bar open late every Saturday night to serve up his impressive organic cocktails, but it’s open during normal restaurant hours too. If you’re in New York, it’s well worth a visit to the world’s first organic bar.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Monday Marketing Memo: Local Foods

Does the 'buy local, eat local' philosophy and strategy conflict with assisting farmers in developing nations who've joined the organic and fair trade agricultural movements?

As our readers know, we write frequently (and generally positively) about the buying and eating locally trend and movement in the Western world, including in the U.S. and UK.
However, we also aren't shy about pointing out the limits of "buy local, eat local," in addition to what we believe is a fact: that peoples from all over the world benefit in the main culturally, economically, socially and politically from buying and eating foods produced in other countries as a way to learn about and better understand others.
Advocating the buying and eating of local foods exclusively is a pre-global worldview in our analysis and opinion. It leaves no room for the many important variables and other crucial aspects of environmental sustainability in a world getting smaller.

Over the weekend, we read a thought provoking analysis and opinion piece on the issue in the San Francisco Chronicle written by William G. Mosely, an associate professor of geography at Macalester College in St, Paul Minn. In his piece in yesterday's Chronicle, Dr. Mosely, who's the author of the book "Hanging by a thread: Cotton, Globalization and Poverty in Africa," posits that the "buy local, eat local" movement has negative consequences in its purest form for farmers in the developing world who've joined the organic and fair trade movements.

As an example of this dilemma, Dr. Mosely, who works with third world farmers, sites a recent event in the UK. Recently, the UK Soil Improvement Association, a nonprofit group that supports sustainable and organic farming, called on the British government to restrict imports of organic produce brought in by air, arguing that the food miles the air-lifted organic fruits and veggies traveled were too many, creating too great of a carbon footprint. In a concession to the fair trade movement, this group would allow for imports from countries actively seeking to promote organic and fair trade markets within their own borders. Despite this concession, Dr. Mosely writes, British fair trade activists are worried.

We aren't sure, nor is Dr. Mosely, if the British government will ultimately pass such a ban. However, the mere proposal and serious discussion of the issue points out the potential conflicts "buy local, eat local" and organic and fair trade can have. This is particularly true since much of the fair trade efforts are aimed at improving the lives of farmers in developing countries. And one way of improving these farmers lives, in addition to paying them more for their crops, is to market some of their foodstuffs in the developed west where it can be sold for more money, returning these profits to the farmers.

In his piece, Dr. Mosely also argues the idea that developing countries should merely create local markets for their crops rather than exporting some of them is a false alternative. He says European and American demand for fair trade products from Africa is surging. These channels are not only bringing a decent return to the third world farmers but also providing and promoting better working conditions and the reduced use of agri-chemicals for these farmers.

Dr. Mosely's concerned that if what he calls the local food craze gets out of hand, it will condemn third world farmers to commodity crop production and ruin their hopes of better returns by continuing to grow and export organic and fair trade fresh fruits and vegetables, along with coffee, cocoa and other similar crops. He isn't anti-local. Rather, in the piece he calls for reason and judgement on the issues.

"While the local food craze is well and good," Dr. Mosely writes, "we should not be so quick to denounce organic and fair trade foods that are imported from the developing world." By shunning these products, we do not encourage local markets to flourish in these countries, but we condemn these farmers to the ills of conventional production for the global market."

Dr. Mosely brings up an important central issue in his piece we believe. That issue is the failure to look at the whole by many rather than the sum of its parts. The whole in this case is economic, environmental and social sustainability globally vis-a-vis food production. The sum of the parts are the organic, fair trade, buy and eat local and other individual movements. To us, the goal should be to integrate all of these food production and marketing sustainability paradigms and systems into one sustainable piece or system. Such a system needs to balance things like eating local with the goals of organic production and fair trade globally, along with numerous other issues.

As mentioned in the beginning of this piece, there are cultural, social, economic and political benefits to nations from importing and exporting food to each other. Developed countries can use food importation as a way to better the standard of living of developing world farmers, as fair trade activists have set their sights on doing. Culturally, learning and sharing other's cuisines and foods is an important first step to social and political understanding.

We agree with the goal of reducing food miles. However, within this reduction must be room for reasonable importation and exportation of crops, foods and related goods for the central reasons we describe above. We agree with Dr. Mosely that the goals of environmental sustainability and assisting developing world farmers don't have to be mutually exclusive. We encourage others--especially "buy local, eat local" activists--to read Dr. Mosely's piece and to think about the issue in a comprehensive, global sustainability sense.